Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Cox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1926No. 16939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión by

ESTES, C..

Parties appear in as the trial court. Cheney sued Cox and others to foreclose a mortgage on real estate. The defendants defaulted, except .Cox, wh,oi filed answer and cross-petition setting up a tax deed — not a resale deed — -issued to one Foster, and a conveyance from Foster to himself, claiming title thereunder, and praying for affirmative decree accordingly against plaintiff. The proceedings of the tax sale and the tax deed to Foster were subsequent to the mortgage of plaintiff on the same real estate. Plaintiff replied that the Foster tax deed was void on its face…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turpin v. LemonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Cochran v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Hatchett v. GoingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Pierce v. BarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Young v. BoswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Henshaw v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Severson v. Roberts, County Treas.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Wolfe v. BrookeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Three-In-One Oil & Gas Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API