Legal Opinion
Strumsky v. Washington Post Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 7, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1798PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Washington Post Company’s Motion [4] to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Upon consideration of defendant’s Motion [4], plaintiffs opposition [7], defendant’s reply [8], the applicable law, and the entire record in this case, the Court will GRANT defendant’s Motion. The Court will explain its reasoning in the analysis that follows.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The facts alleged in the complaint are taken as true for purposes of this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Vasser v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Redmon v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sierra v. HaydenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Alston v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Strumsky v. Washington Post CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.