Legal Opinion
Strumsky v. Washington Post Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 13, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-1798PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff David Strumsky moves for reconsideration of the Court’s February 2012 Order [10] granting defendant Washington Post Company’s (“the Post’s”) motion to dismiss and dismissing the case with prejudice. PL’s Mot. Recons, and Mot. Leave to Amend Compl., ECF No. 12 [hereinafter PL’s Mot. Recons.]. Strumsky also seeks leave to amend his Complaint to correct the deficiencies identified by the dismissal Order and Memorandum Opinion. Id.
Upon consideration of Strumsky’s Motion, the Post’s Opposition [13], Strumsky’s Reply [14], the entire record…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Slate v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Abraha v. Colonial Parking, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Depu v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ghori-Ahmad v. United States Commission on International Religious FreedomDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Anthony v. Int'l Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers Dist. Lodge 1Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.