Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Legal principles applicable to summary judgment are discussed in Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971), and have been applied in many cases by this Court. Authoritative decisions, both state and federal, interpreting and applying Rule 56 hold that the party moving for summary judgment has the burden of “clearly establishing the lack of any *470triable issue of fact by the record properly before the court. His papers are carefully scrutinized; and those of the opposing party are on the whole indulgently regarded.” 6 Pt. 2 Moore’s Federal Practice, §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.