Legal Opinion
Modine Manufacturing Corp. v. Kay
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 27, 1986No. Nos. 85-3397, 85-3496 and 85-3509PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
These petitions require the Court to determine whether it has jurisdiction to review directly administrative interpretations of regulations promulgated under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (1982). If such jurisdiction exists, we then must consider the propriety of the agency’s rulings.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act, covers direct dischargers who send waste into navigable waters, and indirect dischargers who emit waste into sewer systems and publicly owned treatment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bert Williams v. Cynthia Metzler, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and Public Service Electric and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Vineland Chemical Co., Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Narragansett Electric Co. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Arkansas Poultry Federation v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- National Ass'n of Psychiatric Treatment Centers for Children v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.