Legal Opinion

State v. Ducatt

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 19, 1990No. 7981PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a). He claims that the trial court should have granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal and failed to instruct the jury properly on the meaning of the term “operate” as it is used in § 14-227a (a). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. On September 21,1988, at approximately 11:30 p.m., Officer William LaDuke of the Canton police department was on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. State v. RutanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. State v. GaetanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. TetiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. State v. GraciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. State v. WiggsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. State v. WilesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. CyrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API