State v. Rutan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the state presented sufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction of burglary and attempted larceny. The defendant, Ronald A. Rutan, was charged by information with burglary in the third degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123,1 and with criminal attempt to commit larceny in the second degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123.2 The jury found the defendant guilty on both counts and the trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the jury verdict. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction.
T…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Finch v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.