Legal Opinion

State v. Cyr

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 31, 2009No. SC 17975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROGERS, C. J.

This matter is the latest in a line of cases raising the question of what acts constitute operation of a motor vehicle for purposes of Connecticut’s statutory prohibition against operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The defendant, Michael Cyr, appealed from the judgment of conviction, following his conditional plea of nolo contendere 1 to the charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 14-227a (a), 2 and the Appellate Court reversed that judgment after concluding…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Gallagher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  3. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. State v. SmelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. State v. SaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. State v. BereisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. State v. PelellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API