Legal Opinion
State v. Wiggs
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 31, 2000No. AC 19197PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendant, Jesse Wiggs, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a plea of nolo contendere; see General Statutes § 54-94a;1 of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion to dismiss because the state failed to introduce sufficient evidence to support a finding that he had operated a motor vehicle.3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*553On May 23, 1997, the defendant was charged with operating a motor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- State v. DeCosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Pitchell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Coughlin v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. VialpandoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- State v. CoughlinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.