Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Enos
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1909No. 8337PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered July S, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, upon an agreed statement of facts, in an action for breach of covenant against incumbrances.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.
On the 5th day of November, 1904, the defendant, John Enos, conveyed .to the plaintiff Gertrude O’Connor a section of land in Lincoln county for the consideration of $12,000. The deed of conveyance contained the following covenants of warranty:
“And the said John Enos, a bachelor, party of the first part, for his h/irs, executors and administrators, does covenant with the^'said party of the second part, his heirs and assigns, that ne is well seized in fee simple of the lands and premises aforesaid, and has good right to sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid; that the same are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fritz v. PuseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- West Coast Manufacturing & Investment Co. v. West Coast Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Clark v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Anderson v. BigelowWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Cullity v. DorffelWashington Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by16 opinions
- Powers v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Florida Moss Products Co. v. City of LeesburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Matzger v. Arcade Building & Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Garbrick v. FranzWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Morriss v. HesseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.