Legal Opinion

Routh v. Snap-On Tools Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1992No. 9121SC695PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

In this appeal, defendants question the validity of the trial court’s order which concluded there was no agreement to arbitrate. According to defendants, their motion to arbitrate should have been granted since plaintiff Donald Routh’s signature appears on page two (2) of the Termination Agreement wherein there is contained an agreement to arbitrate all controversies. Furthermore, defendants contend that plaintiffs cannot now maintain an action (by arbitration or otherwise) since plaintiffs failed to comply with the one year limitations period contained in paragraph six (6) of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Normile v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Prime South Homes, Inc. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Robbins v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Slaughter v. SwicegoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Martin v. VanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Howard v. Oakwood Homes Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Phillips v. MazyckSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API