Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*94TIMMONS-GOODSON, Justice.
The question chiefly presented is whether the arbitration clause contained in the loan agreements that serve as the basis for the instant case is unconscionable. Because the clause is one-sided, prohibits joinder of claims and class actions, and exposes claimants to prohibitively high costs, we hold that the trial court did not err in concluding as a matter of law that the clause is unconscionable.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Fannie Lee Tillman and Shirley Richardson (“plaintiffs”) are North Carolina residents who obtained loans from defendant Commercial Credit Loans, Inc.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- LILLIAN PEBBLES MORRISON v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., MARK F. SHANKLE, SR. v. PEP BOYS — MANNY, MOE & JACK, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Szetela v. Discover BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Westmoreland v. High Point Healthcare Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Strausberg v. Laurel Healthcare Providers, LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Sisk v. Transylvania Community Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.