Prime South Homes, Inc. v. Byrd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in concluding that plaintiff had waived its right to compel arbitration and specifically alleges that certain findings of fact are not supported by the evidence.
The trial court based its denial of plaintiff’s motion on the following conclusions of law:(1) If arbitration were now ordered, Defendants would be im-permissibly prejudiced by Plaintiff’s delay in seeking arbitration and its actions inconsistent therewith, and by Plaintiff’s use of discovery procedures unavailable in arbitration;(2) Plaintiff has impliedly waived its right…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Cyclone Roofing Co. v. David M. LaFave Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Humphries v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Servomation Corp. v. Hickory Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Routh v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Internet East, Inc. v. Duro Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Raspet v. BuckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Sciolino v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Burke v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.