Legal Opinion
Normile v. Miller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 27, 1985No. 487PA83PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
Defendant Hazel Miller owned real estate located in Charlotte, North Carolina. On 4 August 1980, the property was listed for sale with a local realtor, Gladys Hawkins. On that same day, Richard Byer, a real estate broker with the realty firm Gallery of Homes, showed the property to the prospective purchasers, Plaintiffs Normile and Kurniawan. Afterwards, Byer helped plaintiffs prepare a written offer to purchase the property. A Gallery of Homes form, entitled “Deposit Receipt AND CONTRACT for Purchase and Sale of Real Estate,” containing blanks for the insertion of terms…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Howell v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Goeckel v. StokelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Ward v. . AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Horton v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Chappell v. RothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- McLamb v. T.P., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Barry Rowland v. Sandy Morris FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Routh v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Martin v. VanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.