Legal Opinion
Martin v. Vance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided May 4, 1999No. COA98-649PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Judge.
On 30 December 1997, plaintiff filed this action against her former employer, Duke University (Duke), and her former supervisors Jeffrey Vance (Vance) and Ronald Beauvais (Beauvais) alleging battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference with contract, and negligent retention. Plaintiff had been employed at Duke since 1990 as a nonexempt biweekly employee who was not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. This meant she was paid every two weeks and was subject to federal overtime restrictions. She was not employed for a fixed period of time…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- The Prudential Insurance Co. Of America, a New Jersey Corporation v. Justine Lai Elvira ViernesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Deborah Patterson v. Tenet Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Eddie L. Hightower v. Gmri, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Raspet v. BuckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Howard v. Oakwood Homes Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Ellison v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Adams v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.