Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Reidy

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1933No. Docket No. 4634PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, J., pro tem.

The action of Andrews v. Reidy et al. was brought for declaratory relief, etc. The Andrews owned a note secured by mortgage for $31,000. This note and mortgage had been assigned to a bank as collateral security for a loan. The bank began foreclosure proceedings which proceeded to judgment. The Andrews entered into an arrangement with P. M. Reidy whereby he should advance money necessary to pay off the Andrews’ loan to the bank and the interest and costs of the foreclosure proceedings. Under this arrangement Reidy was to bid in the property at the foreclosure sale and hold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. King v. California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Fales v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knouse v. NimocksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Andrews v. ReidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Malinow v. DorenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API