John R. Gentle & Co. v. Britton

A rehearing was granted after an opinion in this case had been handed down by the district court of appeal. The principal reason for allowing said rehearing was that in the complaint of John R. Gentle & Co. it was shown that the work, which was the basis of the liens mentioned in this action, was completed May 19,1906, while plaintiff showed at the trial only that appellant, Amy E. Britton went to the property “in May, 1906,” and, according to the appellant, from all that appears in the record the work may have been finished prior to that time. Upon further examination of the transcript,…