Legal Opinion

Allen v. Wilson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1918No. L. A. No. 4528. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Defendant on February 25, 1914, being the owner of a tract of land in Los Angeles, entered into a written contract to sell it to E. L. Barrett on the installment plan, with provisions for'default in the payments and foreclosure. There were three small houses on the tract. Barrett was put in possession of the property and shortly afterward employed the plaintiff, without notice to or the knowledge of defendant, to wreck the three houses and from the materials thereof and new material to. erect a larger house on the lot. Plaintiff completed the construction of the house and Barrett having…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McClain v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. West Coast Lumber Co. v. NewkirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ah Louis v. HarwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. John R. Gentle & Co. v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oaks v. KendallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Barr Lumber Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. California Delta Farms, Inc v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Diamond Match Co. v. Sanitary Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. AMERICAN TRANSIT MIX CO., INC. v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API