Mott v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The actions were brought to enforce mechanics' liens and were consolidated for trial. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs against Frank P. Williams, the contractor, and in favor of Frank E. Wright, the owner, for his costs; and that the plaintiffs were not entitled to liens upon the premises described in the complaints. The appeal is by plaintiffs from the judgment.
The owner, defendant Wright, entered into a contract with the contractor, defendant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Harlan v. StufflebeemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scott, Blake & Wynne v. Summit Ridge Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Lewis v. HopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Fidelity Sound Systems. Inc. v. American Bonding Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978
- Picerne Construction Corp. v. Castellino VillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Southwest Paving Co. v. Stone HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.