Baxter v. Vineland Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The prayer of plaintiff’s complaint was that the court adjudge the tax sales of defendant Vineland Irrigation District and the certificates issued thereon to he illegal, null, and void; that the bonds issued by the district, the sale of the bonds, and their use by the district be declared to be illegal and void; that the sale of plaintiff’s lands and the certificates of the same issued by the district be canceled; that the defendant the collector of the district, his deputies and agents, be enjoined from issuing any deeds to the purchaser, the said district, and that it be enjoined…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hughson v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Pompton v. Cooper UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Meyer v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rialto Irr. Dist. v. StowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Haese v. HeitzegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Young v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- John R. Gentle & Co. v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Leeman v. Perris Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.