Legal Opinion
Nolte v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1961No. Civ. 18716PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COAKLEY, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiff George S. Nolte, a licensed civil engineer, prevailed at the trial of this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for services rendered in connection with a land subdivision project. Defendants, William B. and Eileen Cusack, and others, are owners of the land. The Cusacks appeal.
The trial court found that Nolte was employed to perform the engineering services necessary to subdivide the property into residential lots; that he performed all the terms of the contract; that his services consisted of surveying, planning and mapping said property for such subdivision,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lamoreaux v. AnderschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Hendrickson v. BertelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Humboldt Lumber Mill Co. v. CrispCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Fitzgerald v. WalshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Booth v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Nickel Mine Brook Associates v. SakalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Beneficial Finance Co. v. Wegmiller Bender Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Scott, Blake & Wynne v. Summit Ridge Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.