Legal Opinion
Genesco, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 24, 2000No. 92-02-00084; SLIP OP. 00-57PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
WATSON, Senior Judge.
In this action, the court revisits the hotly contested and somewhat esoteric issue of whether imported footwear has a “foxing-like band,” and consequently, subject to a higher rate of duty than would otherwise be assessed on the footwear. Currently before the court is plaintiffs challenge to the classification by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) of six styles of men’s and boy’s athletic shoes imported by plaintiff that Customs determined have a “foxing-like band.” The court’s jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a).
Upon liquidation of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ero Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Uniden America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- 3G Mermet Fabric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Luigi Bormioli Corp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.