Legal Opinion
Kleinecke v. Montecito Water District
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1983No. Civ. 66784PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
Plaintiff David Kleinecke (Kleinecke) brought an action against defendant Montecito Water District (Water District) to quiet title and obtain a permanent injunction to remove water pressure regulators and housings from his land. He appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Water District based on the running of the statute of limitations.
We conclude that Water District is estopped to raise the bar of the statute of limitations.
Facts
Declarations filed on behalf of Kleinecke and Water District disclose the following scenario: beginning in 1978, counsel for Kleinecke…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hocharian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Alling v. Universal Manufacturing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jordan v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cascade Gardens Homeowners Ass'n v. McKellar & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Grell v. Laci Le Beau Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.