Legal Opinion

Cascade Gardens Homeowners Ass'n v. McKellar & Associates

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1987No. D004678PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, J.

Cascade Gardens Homeowners Association (Cascade) appeals an order granting summary judgment in favor of McKellar & Associates (McKellar).

Cascade contends the trial court erred since (1) evidence of estoppel was not negated; (2) the allegations of willful and fraudulent conduct rendered the statute of limitations defense inapplicable to the present case; and (3) the repairs constituted an improvement within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 337.15 and thus the action is not barred.

Cascade correctly states the rule that repairs toll the statute of limitations, but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Miller v. Bechtel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Barnhouse v. City of PinoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Asare v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Violette v. ShoupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Monson v. Paramount Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. A & B Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API