Cascade Gardens Homeowners Ass'n v. McKellar & Associates
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, J.
Cascade Gardens Homeowners Association (Cascade) appeals an order granting summary judgment in favor of McKellar & Associates (McKellar).
Cascade contends the trial court erred since (1) evidence of estoppel was not negated; (2) the allegations of willful and fraudulent conduct rendered the statute of limitations defense inapplicable to the present case; and (3) the repairs constituted an improvement within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 337.15 and thus the action is not barred.
Cascade correctly states the rule that repairs toll the statute of limitations, but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Miller v. Bechtel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Barnhouse v. City of PinoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Asare v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Violette v. ShoupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Monson v. Paramount Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- A & B Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.