Legal Opinion

Sukut Construction, Inc. v. Rimrock CA

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 2011No. D057774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*822Opinion

O’ROURKE, J.

Construction, Inc. (Sukut), appeals from a summary adjudication of its cause of action for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The court ruled in favor of Otay Valley Quarry LLC (Otay) and Rimrock CA LLC (Rimrock), the owner and operator, respectively, of Otay Valley Quarry (Quarry), located in Chula Vista, California. Sukut contends that Quarry is a “mine” and the hard rock products extracted from it are “minerals” within the meaning of the Public Resources Code; therefore, Sukut was entitled to record and enforce a mining lien under Civil Code1 section 3060. Sukut…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Precision Framing Sys. Inc. v. Luzuriaga, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. In re Crescent Associates, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  3. Precision Framing Systems Inc. v. LuzuriagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API