Legal Opinion

Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 6, 1983No. 81-1686PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

The Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916, the last of the great Homestead Acts, provided for the settlement of homesteads on lands the surface of which was “chiefly valuable for grazing and raising forage crops” and “not susceptible of irrigation from any known source of water supply.” 43 U. S. C. § 292. Congress reserved to the United States title to “all the coal and other minerals” in lands patented under the Act. 43 U. S. C. §299. The question presented by this case is *38whether gravel found on lands patented under the Act is a mineral reserved to the United States.

The Stock-Raising…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Helvering v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane County, UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. San Juan County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Becker v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API