Legal Opinion

California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. Rank

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1990No. S002524PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

The issue before us is whether a hospital may permit clinical psychologists to take primary responsibility for the diagnosis and treatment of their hospitalized patients. Prior to 1978, regulations of the Department of Health Services (hereafter Department) declared that a psychiatrist must take charge of the diagnosis and treatment of all patients admitted to psychiatric wards or hospitals.1 In 1978, however, the Legislature enacted Health and Safety Code section 1316.5,2 which after confirming that hospitals could admit psychologists to their staffs, provided that such…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API