Cook v. Cockins
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Riverside County denying a new trial. J. S. Royes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Chipman, C.
On February 13, 1894, Caroline M. Cook, now deceased (referred to herein as plaintiff) wife of Joseph A. Cook, filed her verified complaint in the superior court of Riverside county, alleging owner*143ship of certain land situated therein, and claiming an undivided one-fourth interest in the land, and an ownership of an undivided three-fourths interest in the same land in the defendant, and praying for partition of their several interests. The defendant filed a verified answer denying that the plaintiff was the owner of any interest in said land. For a separate answer to the complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Robins v. HopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Washburn v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Carty v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ryan v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Gray v. BrunoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hopkins v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Hasenjeager v. VothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.