Holm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas •county, Kauffman, J., entered July 15, 1909, in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action on contract and for the foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien, after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The respondents Jacobson and Lindstrom, having a contract with their co-respondent for the construction of a portion of its roadbed in Kittitas county, entered into a contract with the appellant, whereby he agreed to do the constiuction work for the roadbed to the extent of about 3,600 feet. Failing to reach an agreement with them as to the amount due- him upon the completion of the contract, the appellant brought this action to recover an alleged balance, and to establish and foreclose a lien against the right of way of the respondent railway company to satisfy the same. This appeal is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Davis v. La Crosse Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Nice v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Globe Light & Heat Co. v. DoudMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Beers v. KuehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Sweeney v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Strickland v. Rainier Golf & Country ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Elder Mercantile Co. v. Ottawa Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Pacific Lumber & Timber Co. v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.