Legal Opinion

Goben v. Akin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 12, 1929No. 39750PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

Defendant had contracted with the city of Crestón to do curbing and guttering and the subgrading therefor. Plaintiff alleges an express verbal contract with defendant to do the subgrading at 55 cents per superficial yard. He claims only part performance, and asserts, as excuse for not fully performing, that, to enable plaintiff to carry on the work, it was necessary and agreed that he should be paid every two weeks; that defendant did not make such payments, and consequently plaintiff was compelled to discontinue the work. He asks to recover at the contract rate for the work done. Defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Galusha v. WendtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Shelby-Downard Asphalt Co. v. EnyartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Central Georgia Power Co. v. StubbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Johnson v. Harder & AverySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Sachs v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bascom v. District Court of Cerro Gordo CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  2. Eggleston v. West Virginia Department of HighwaysWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Brown v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. In Re Anderson's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. Duke v. ParkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API