Legal Opinion

Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 29, 1892PublishedCited by 95 opinions

Appeal from Macon Circuit Coiwt. — Hon. Andrew Ellison, Judge; (1) The court erred in striking out a portion of the first count of the petition on the ground that the determination of the respondents’ engineers could not be impeached except in a court of equity.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Macon Circuit Coiwt. — Hon. Andrew Ellison, Judge; (1) The court erred in striking out a portion of the first count of the petition on the ground that the determination of the respondents’ engineers could not be impeached except in a court of equity. (2) The court erred in excluding plaintiffs’ evidence offered to show that no measurement or calculations were made by the respondents’ engineers, and that the work had been made by appellants’ engineers, and was correctly stated-in the petition. 2 Wood on Eailway Law, 995-997 Stark v. DeGraff, 22 Minn. 431; Herrick v. Railroad, 27…

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

In the year 1887 the Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Company of Iowa, a corporation of the state of Iowa, began the construction of a line of railroad from Kansas City, Missouri, through Missouri and Iowa to the Mississippi river, and the Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Company, an Illinois corporation, began the construction of a railroad from the Mississippi river to Chicago in continuation of the other line. A. A. Robinson was second vice-president and chief engineer of the Illinois company. B. F. Booker was chief engineer of the Iowa company.

On the twelfth of January, 1887,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Scovill v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Chicago, Santa Fé & California Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Sweet v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. McCormick v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. Neill v. GatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API