Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. King

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1946No. 28,174PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilkison, J.

Appellants brought this action to enjoin appellee from violating an alleged negative covenant contained in a written contract between appellants and appellee. Appellee’s general demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the court below, appellants refused to plead further and judgment was rendered for appellee, from which appellants appeal, assigning as error the sustaining of the demurrer.

In determining the correctness or lack of correctness of the court’s ruling on the demurrer we are governed by the rule that, for the purposes of the demurrer, all facts well pleaded are taken as true. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Walb Construction Co. v. ChipmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Harrison v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  4. Western & Southern Life Insurance v. ValeIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. International Shoe Co. v. LacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc. v. WoodsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. James Oddie, Edward Cwiertniewicz, John Penzak, Oscar King, Harry C. Bremmer v. Ross Gear and Tool Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  4. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp. v. MollIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Harvest Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Inter-Ocean Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API