Legal Opinion

Norlund v. Faust

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1997No. 27A02-9512-CV-753PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellants, Dr. Ronald Norlund (R. Nor-lund), Dr. Dawn Norlund (D. Norlund) and Indiana Cataract and Laser, P.C. (ICL) appeal the trial court’s December 8, 1995, findings, conclusions and order granting a preliminary injunction against them on behalf of appellees, Dr. Joseph Faust (Faust) individually and d/b/a Faust Eye Center (Eye Center) and Faust Eye Center, P.C. (Faust, P.C.).

Appellants present five issues for review which this court restates as follows:

1. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the actions of appellants breached the covenant not to compete;

2.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Perez v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Temps Plus, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. KruegerIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Barlow v. SipesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Coates v. Heat Wagons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Burk v. Heritage Food Service Equipment, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API