Norlund v. Faust
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Appellants, Dr. Ronald Norlund (R. Nor-lund), Dr. Dawn Norlund (D. Norlund) and Indiana Cataract and Laser, P.C. (ICL) appeal the trial court’s December 8, 1995, findings, conclusions and order granting a preliminary injunction against them on behalf of appellees, Dr. Joseph Faust (Faust) individually and d/b/a Faust Eye Center (Eye Center) and Faust Eye Center, P.C. (Faust, P.C.).
Appellants present five issues for review which this court restates as follows:
1. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the actions of appellants breached the covenant not to compete;
2.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Perez v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Dawson v. Temps Plus, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. KruegerIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Barlow v. SipesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Coates v. Heat Wagons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Burk v. Heritage Food Service Equipment, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.