Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Fund v. Gallegos

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1987No. 86CA0959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZGER, Judge.

The Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Commission which ordered it to pay 67% of the permanent total disability benefits payable to Joe S. Gallegos (claimant). We set aside the order and remand with directions.

Claimant was rendered permanently and totally disabled from the combined effect of prior industrial injuries to his knees and a subsequent industrial injury to his back. The back (subsequent) injury was rated as a 33% permanent partial disability as a working unit. The Industrial Commission ordered claimant’s employer at the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Loomis v. SeelyColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. McGrath v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. In Re the Marriage of BeckmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Just in Case Business Lighthouse, LLC v. MurrayColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Rosa v. Warner Electrical ContractingColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. City of Boulder v. DinsmoreColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API