Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Seely

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1983No. 82CA1253PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

In this replevin action, plaintiffs, Addison R. Loomis and Mabel A. Loomis, appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of defendants, Hugh Seely and Bruce H. Seely. We affirm.

Plaintiffs had leased certain real property (the ranch) from defendants. When they were unable to make their annual rent payment, plaintiffs vacated the ranch, leaving behind certain personal property. Subsequently, a dispute arose over plaintiffs’ access to the ranch in order to remove their remaining personal property, and plaintiffs, acting pro se, initiated this replevin action. Defendants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manka v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Schuster v. ZwickerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Laessig v. May D & F & American Credit Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. Viles v. ScofieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  5. Cole v. KyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Westrac, Inc. v. Walker Field, Colorado, Public Airport AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Negron v. GolderColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Yadon v. SouthwardColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. of ChavezColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. McCall v. MeyersColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API