Legal Opinion
Rosa v. Warner Electrical Contracting
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 1993No. 91CA1523PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge SMITH.
Christina, Joshua, Amber, and Nathaniel Rosa (claimants), who are dependents of the deceased employee, Steven L. Rosa (decedent), challenge the constitutionality of the workers’ compensation offset statute applied by the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel in determining that respondents, Warner Electrical Contracting (employer) and Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority (CCIA), are entitled to offset 100% of claimants’ workers’ compensation dependency benefits against their social security death benefits. We uphold the constitutionality of the workers’ compensation offset…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bellendir v. KezerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- McClanathan v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Marinez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATESupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Meyer v. Industrial Commission of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. GallegosColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Tobin's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Rosa v. Warner Electrical ContractingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Tomsha v. City of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rosa v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1994