Legal Opinion

City of Boulder v. Dinsmore

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1995No. 94CE0029PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

Petitioners, City of Boulder and Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, seek review of the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel that awarded Eugene A. Dinsmore (claimant) medical impairment benefits for psychological impairment. The petitioners assert that the director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation violated petitioners’ right to procedural due process by failing to adopt “impairment rating guidelines” for psychological injuries as required by statute. We conclude that petitioners were not denied due process and, therefore, affirm.

Claimant worked…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elizondo v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Kraus v. Artcraft Sign Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Hendricks v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Donn v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Subsequent Injury Fund v. GallegosColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wisehart v. Zions BancorporationColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Ortega v. INDUS. CLAIM APPEALS OFF. OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Askew v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API