Legal Opinion
Aguilar v. Association for Retarded Citizens
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 9, 1991No. D014154PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
The issue in this case is whether the Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) is required to pay employees who work less than 24-hour shifts for time when the employees are allowed to sleep. We conclude ARC is required to compensate the employees for all the hours they are subject to ARC’S control, including hours when the employees are allowed to sleep.
Facts
ARC is a state-funded, nonprofit organization which provides care for mentally handicapped individuals throughout the Imperial Valley. ARC operates group homes for these mentally handicapped individuals. ARC employs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Webster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Sali ex rel. Themselves v. Corona Reg'l Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.