Legal Opinion

Prachasaisoradej v. Ralphs Grocery Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2007No. S128576PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We confront a significant question of California wage law. Defendant Ralphs Grocery Company, Inc. (Ralphs), a supermarket chain, implemented a written incentive compensation plan (ICP or Plan) whereby certain employees of each store were eligible to receive, over and above their regular wages, supplementary sums based upon how the store’s actual Plan-defined profits, if any, for specified periods compared with preset profitability targets. For both target and actual purposes, profits were determined by subtracting store operating expenses from store revenues. Plaintiff claims…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Donohue v. AMN Services, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Davis v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Stoetzl v. Dept. of Human ResourcesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API