Legal Opinion

McCartin v. Westlake

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 14, 1994No. 92-P-760PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillerman, J.

At least since Bates v. Southgate, 308 Mass. 170 (1941), 4 we have witnessed the need, in cases challenging the enforceability of a contract on the claim of fraud, to resolve the conflict between providing relief to victims of the alleged fraud and fending off the threat to contractual certainty (by denying such relief). Compare Plumer v. Luce, 310 Mass. 789 (1942) (denying relief, with Mc-Evoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co., 408 Mass. 704 (1990) (granting relief). See most recently Greenery Rehabilitation Group, Inc. v. Antaramian, ante 73 (1994) (denying relief). This case is to be added…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Barrett Associates, Inc. v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kenda Corp. v. Pot O'Gold Money Leagues, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Piantes v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  3. Armstrong v. Rohm and Haas Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  4. Davis v. Dawson, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  5. Ravosa v. ZaisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API