Legal Opinion

Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1992PublishedCited by 189 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This action arises out of failed negotiations between the plaintiff and the defendant, Federal-Mogul Corp., for the purchase and sale of Federal-Mogul’s Vellumoid Division (division), which Federal-Mogul eventually sold to another party (buyer), who organized a new corporation, the defendant Vellumoid, Inc. The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that Federal-Mogul breached an agreement to negotiate in good faith with the plaintiff and to honor the plaintiff’s right of first refusal; defrauded the plaintiff; and violated G. L. c. 93A, § 11 (1990 ed.). The plaintiff alleged that the buyer…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Freelander v. G. & K. REALTY CORP.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. Simons v. American Dry Ginger Ale Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Shayeb v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by189 opinions

  1. Kurker v. HellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  2. Anthony Artuso v. Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. Ahern v. ScholzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. VaradianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API