Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Rohm and Haas Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 15, 2004No. Civil Action 03-40246-FDSPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAYLOR, District Judge.
This is a civil action arising from defendant’s alleged breach of an oral agreement to provide plaintiffs with “all the work they could handle.” Pending before this Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
I. Background
The following facts are as alleged in the complaint. 1 Plaintiffs Robert Armstrong and Marc Pottle were employed as ceramic grinders by Morton International, Inc., at its facility in Spencer, Massachusetts. In 1999 Rohm and Haas Company, Inc.,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Smith v. F.W. Morse Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- White Sands Group, LLC v. PRS II, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Oliver Wyman, Inc. v. EielsonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Access Cardiosystems, Inc. v. Fincke (In Re Access Cardiosystems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Dixon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Aspect Software, Inc. v. BarnettDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.