Legal Opinion
Barrett Associates, Inc. v. Aronson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 31, 1963PublishedCited by 160 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
In this action of tort for deceit demurrers to the second and third counts, as amended, were sustained, and leave to amend further was denied. The plaintiff appealed.
The material averments of the second count are as follows : In April, 1960, the defendants Aronson and Levitt organized a corporation called Hollywood Lanes of Walpole, Inc. (Hollywood). Levitt was president and treasurer of the corporation and Aronson was its clerk. Levitt represented to the plaintiff that both he and Aronson “then intended to take no salary or other funds, directly or indirectly,” from Hollywood until it was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keene Lumber Co. v. LeventhalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Yerid v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Kilroy v. BarronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Feldman v. WitmarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Alpine v. Friend Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Sands v. Ridefilm Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Kelley v. LaForceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.