Legal Opinion

Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 24, 1979PublishedCited by 316 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Although the underlying cause is a contract action for material sold and services delivered, the insertion in the complaint of a claim under G. L. c. 93A, § 11, requires consideration once again of the reach of that statutory provision to commercial disputes between business organizations.

First, however, we must meet a procedural issue. The complaint was filed on July 8, 1974. It alleged that the plaintiff (Trane), at the request of the defendant (Forbes), repaired a central air conditioning unit located in a department store in Springfield; that Forbes had refused to pay Trane’s bill for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by316 opinions

  1. Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc., Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Crellin Technologies, Inc. v. Equipmentlease Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

311 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API