Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Buckingham

California Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1916No. L. A. No. 3650. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The defendant, C. B. Williams, has appealed from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone.

The complaint alleges that the defendant Joseph G. Buckingham is indebted to the plaintiff in divers sums amounting to $912; that he is a nonresident of the state of California; that on March 18, 1910, Buckingham, for the purpose of defrauding the plaintiff and others of his creditors, conveyed certain described real estate to the defendant C. B. Williams, who took the same in furtherance of the fraudulent purpose of Buckingham. Judgment is prayed for the amount of the indebtedness, and that the deed so…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McMinn v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. First National Bank v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Lyden v. Spohn-Patrick Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Aigeltinger v. EinsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fornaseri v. Cosmosart Realty & Building Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. DeRyanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Delaney Producing & Refining Co. v. Crystal Petroleum Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Nielsen v. GillespieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Hamburger Apparel Co. v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API