Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Gillespie

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1929No. Docket No. 6689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered, for defendants and respondents Gillespie, Gray, and Hendry, following his refusal to further amend his fourth amended complaint.

As stated by appellant, the gist of his complaint against respondents is that, being neither directors nor officers of the corporation defendant, which was organized under the laws of the state of California, upon their representations that they would manage and operate its business, three of the five corporate directors were induced to resign, whereupon respondents took control of the corporate business…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. BuckinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Delaney Producing & Refining Co. v. Crystal Petroleum Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Haro v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Miller v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API