Legal Opinion
Cherry v. American National Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 19, 1988No. C1-88-431PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Reginald Cherry seeks review of a determination that he engaged in misconduct for unemployment compensation purposes. We reverse.
PACTS
Reginald Cherry began working as a field representative for American National Insurance Company in the fall of 1985. In July 1987, Cherry’s car broke down and he could not afford to pay the repair bill. When he still did not have a car by August 28, 1987, Cherry was discharged from his job with American National.
Cherry applied for unemployment compensation benefits, but his claim was denied on the basis that he had engaged in misconduct.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Colburn v. Pine Portage Madden Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Winkler v. Park Refuse Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cook v. PlayworksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Work Connection, Inc. v. BuiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Cook v. PlayworksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Work Connection, Inc. v. BuiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008