Legal Opinion
Work Connection, Inc. v. Bui
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 8, 2008No. A07-0348PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Relator employer appeals from the award of unemployment-insurance benefits *65to respondent employee, arguing that the employee who relies on public transportation is not available for employment throughout the labor market area as required by Minn.Stat. § 268.085, subd. 15(e) (2006). We affirm.
FACTS
Relator The Work Connection, Inc., is a temporary-staffing service that employed Son Bui from February 2, 2004, to August 29, 2006. Bui worked at Work Connection’s client, Technical Resin and Packaging, until he called in sick on August 29, 2006, and his employment was terminated.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Grushus v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Halvorson v. County of AnokaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Mohamed Yusuf, Relator v. Masterson Personnel, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Neumann v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Voeurn A. Sandberg, Relator v. Zaws, Inc., Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Work Connection, Inc. v. BuiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008