Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Taub & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 1969PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.
The claimants, Herman and Anne Taub, appeal from an order which granted the respondent Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation’s (hereinafter referred to as MVAIC) motion for a permanent stay of arbitration. The facts are not in dispute. The claim arose out of an accident which allegedly occurred within the 'State of New York on February 22, 1965. The claimants were in an automobile which was involved in a two-car collision. The second car (the alleged offending vehicle), owned by one Bichard E. Schwartz, was registered in New Jersey. On the date of the accident the Schwartz…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pattani v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrowerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Katz v. American Motorist InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. PokerwinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by15 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dairyland Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Canty v. Motor Vehicle Accident inDemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Allstate Insurance v. GiordanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- State-Wide Insurance v. CurryNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.