Canty v. Motor Vehicle Accident inDemnification Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J. P.
At issue is the interrelationship between certain provisions of the Insurance Law. More specifically, the question before us is whether a pedestrian injured by a “hit and run” vehicle, who applies to the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) for no-fault benefits, must comply with the requirements imposed by sections 5208 (subd [A], par 2) and 5218 of the Insurance Law by report*510ing the accident “within twenty-four hours after the occurrence to a police, peace or judicial officer in the vicinity or to the [C]ommissioner” of Motor Vehicles…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Allstate Insurance v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- In re the Arbitration between Taub & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Claim of Fullerton v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Girard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re the Arbitration between Country Wide Insurance & RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Hernandez v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Archer v. Beach Car Serv., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Wilcox v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.